Platform owner · Risk and compliance · IT leadership
Software intelligence under your controls.
Several of your systems need the same scrutiny, and your organization has firm rules about where code, data and analysis results may go. You need a continuing program that respects your access, retention and audit policies, not a tool your teams must install and operate.
The questions you need answered.
- Can the analysis happen inside infrastructure we control?
- Which data leaves our environment, if any, and under what terms?
- What access controls and audit evidence do we get?
- How are retention and deletion of artifacts handled?
- Who owns the artifacts we commission?
Worth knowing first.
Control is location plus policy
Where analysis runs decides whose policies apply. Keeping it inside your environment puts your policies in charge. It does not by itself make you compliant with anything.
Verify data flows, do not assume them
A promise that nothing leaves is only as good as the architecture behind it. Map every flow before relying on it.
Price the work, not the industry
Extra controls cost more only when they add real engineering and operational effort. Being regulated is not, on its own, a reason to pay more.
Scoping a controlled engagement.
Environment
Where the work must happen, what connectivity is allowed, and which systems it must reach.
Data flows
What is accessed, what is produced, and what may leave. Confirmed against the architecture.
Access and audit
Who may analyze what, and the audit evidence you need afterwards.
Artifacts
Retention, deletion, handling procedures and your rights to what is delivered.
Where Foundry fits.
Every finding carries its evidence state: verified, observed, inferred or open. How we work.
Controlled Environment Engagement
Analysis inside infrastructure you control, with restricted connectivity, additional audit evidence and agreed retention and deletion, once feasibility is confirmed.
Enterprise Intelligence Program
Multiple systems or critical workflows under one annual program, with scheduled analysis, periodic reviews and agreed priority handling.
Or start with an Assessment
Many organizations scope one system first and decide about a program afterwards.
Reading for your situation.
How to define an effective software intelligence engagement
What to pin down before anyone analyzes a system for you: the decision, the authorized target, data handling, success criteria, deliverables and limits.
Next step.
Bring the people who own environment, data and audit. We work through the scoping questions together.